Anyone can claim they do SEO. So I picked five subjects this studio has no authority in whatsoever — AI music software, a mobile game, Doom lore, YouTube culture — wrote one genuinely good page for each, and watched what Google did with them.
Google Search Console, 16 months to 11 October 2026. Average position is across every query the page surfaced for, so the best-performing queries sit well above these numbers.
| Post | Subject | Clicks | Impressions | Avg. position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suno custom tags | AI music production | 37 | 9,302 | 10.7 |
| The Atlas Earth scam | Mobile gaming | 27 | 9,730 | 17.8 |
| Structuring Suno songs | AI music production | 14 | 4,168 | 13.0 |
| Why reaction videos rewind | YouTube culture | 4 | 1,168 | 9.5 |
| The complete Doom timeline | Video game lore | 2 | 10,666 | 12.5 |
The Doom post is the clearest case. It surfaced for 348 variations of the same question, and landed in the top ten for 78 of them — doom franchise complete lore summary timeline from 1993 to doom the dark ages averaged position 4.5. Against id Software, IGN, Fandom and every gaming site on the internet.
Pick a question people actually type, not a keyword a tool suggests. “Doom franchise complete lore timeline from 1993 to The Dark Ages” is a real search with a real intent behind it, and almost nobody writes the page that answers it properly.
Answer it completely, in one place. The competition for enthusiast queries is usually a forum thread, a wiki fragment, or a video. A single page that covers the whole thing beats all three.
Structure it so a machine can parse it. Question-shaped headings, chronological or categorical ordering, short definitional openings — the same structure that gets a passage quoted in an AI answer.
Write it like someone who cares about the subject. Every one of these came from genuine interest, and it shows in a way that generated filler does not.
Publish it on a domain with no topical authority whatsoever. That is the point of the test: a web studio in Plano has no business ranking for Doom lore.
It proves that a domain with zero topical authority can reach page one on subjects it has no standing in, without links, ads or tricks — on structure and quality alone. That is the hard part of SEO, and it is the same work your commercial pages need.
It doesn't prove that these were competitive commercial terms. They weren't. These are long-tail enthusiast queries where the existing results were thin, which is exactly why they were a fair test of method rather than of budget. Clicks were modest: 84 across sixteen months.
I'd rather show you real Search Console numbers with that caveat attached than a chart with no context on it. If someone shows you rankings without telling you what the competition looked like, ask.
Same method, aimed at the questions your customers type. Start with a free audit and I'll tell you plainly what your pages are missing.
Get a free audit